Chaotic Logic

"Pilgrim, pilgrimage and way are but myself toward myself." -- Farid Ud-Din Attar


On the internet, I go by photonasty.


I'm interested in the mysteries of life and death.

I post:

- art - psychedelia - photography - quotes - the occasional meme


This morning, as I was browsing some of the “freelice” and “truth blog” related tags, I came across this. It nearly made me want to cry, and my heart really goes out to this person.
I have been there. I know what it is to feel that way, and I understand all too well what drives a person to do that to themselves. I think that our culture as a whole places far, far too much emphasis on the body and its attractiveness, to the exclusion of all else. Look at magazines. Look at advertising. There is so much guilt associated with food and weight in advertising and media, and I think it creates this idea that if you aren’t “fit” or thin enough, it is a reflection of a personal weakness and lack of discipline that not only makes you sexually unattractive, but a bad or inferior person. It isn’t about being attractive, or feeling attractive, at least not in and of itself. It is about one’s sense of value and of goodness. It strikes to the heart of someone’s innermost self.
When you develop these eating-disordered attitudes and behaviors, as the obsessions and compulsions grow within you, you find yourself at a point when so much of yourself, of your self-worth, of your sense of accomplishment and personal value, becomes contingent on maintaining the appearance of your body. You feel that you need to do this, in order to make yourself whole, to redeem yourself and feel that you have worth.
These things eat your soul. They really do. What I mean by this, is that they become such a part of you, of who you are and of who you want to be, that in many ways your very self can become contingent on it. There comes to be so much guilt, so much self-loathing that comes if you gain a few pounds, or forget to work out—- you begin to really feel like you are an inferior person if your body maintenance falters. 
THIS is what makes eating disorders so abhorrant, and such a devastating disease. Certainly, the behaviors that eating disordered individuals engage in are physically harmful, especially in the longer term—- but I do not even think that this is the worst part of it. The true evil here, is that it has to do with hating your self. Not just your body. It is a matter of your innermost sense of worth. To hate oneself is a terrible thing; perhaps one of the most terrible things for a person.
The truth is that you cannot, CANNOT, make the physical appearance and supposed attractiveness of your body, your principle locus of self-worth. You cannot put your center there, if you ever are to truly live or to truly be free. Eating disorders can be highly compartmentalized. When we fall into these kinds of behaviors and thought processes, there is always a part of us, I think, deep within our innermost Selves, that knows that this isn’t right. And yet it is so, so difficult to break out of these patterns of thinking once you become so deeply mired in them. 
I want to make it clear that no individual with an eating disorder should EVER be derided for thinking this way. These things grow inside you slowly over time; they consume you bit by bit. An eating disorder is not born in a day, and it does not go away instantly. There’s no magic moment wherein one thinks, “Oh, wait, I have intrinsic value by virtue of being a person, and associating so much guilt and self-loathing with food and weight is learned and socially constructed bullshit! The hell was I thinking! I’ma go eat a sandwich now.” If only it were that easy to break out of these nigh-delusory ways of thinking about oneself. The truth is that these things are never, ever easy. 
There is a misconception among some people, I think, that eating disorders are motivated merely by vanity. This is not the case. I do not think the young women who tend to be the ones to suffer from this illness, chose to place transfer their sense of their chance for self-worth onto their body’s appearance because they’re vain, or because they’re such dull or vapid people that looks are all they’ve got. These things are learned, and they are absorbed from the surrounding culture and social environment. So much of advertising and media projects this idea that if you lose weight, or get fit, you become a better person overall. Changing your body becomes a proxy for changing your whole self, and it is a mistaken transference. 
Being thin, or fit, or attractive, will not make you whole. It won’t make you a good or “better” person. I find it so troubling that the general cultural climate regarding attitudes toward body shape and size, perpetuated all too often by advertisers trying to sell products or entertainment by preying on insecurity, so often leads people to think otherwise.
*ETA: Response to lunarskylar’s comment: Fake or not, that changes nothing of what I have said. I still feel that the attitude expressed by that person reflects much of how people who suffer from EDs view their body and their ED behaviors. This isn’t about this one person. I was using what they said as an example, and it was what motivated me to make this post. This goes far beyond any one person. This is a pervasive problem that is rooted, at least partly, on a social level. People learn things from the surrounding culture—- not only from parents, peers, and others they have contact with, but also from the media. Vicarious social learning by way of the media is not to be underestimated. It is a very real phenomenon, and much of it is absorbed in a way of which individuals are not always fully aware.

This morning, as I was browsing some of the “freelice” and “truth blog” related tags, I came across this. It nearly made me want to cry, and my heart really goes out to this person.

I have been there. I know what it is to feel that way, and I understand all too well what drives a person to do that to themselves. I think that our culture as a whole places far, far too much emphasis on the body and its attractiveness, to the exclusion of all else. Look at magazines. Look at advertising. There is so much guilt associated with food and weight in advertising and media, and I think it creates this idea that if you aren’t “fit” or thin enough, it is a reflection of a personal weakness and lack of discipline that not only makes you sexually unattractive, but a bad or inferior person. It isn’t about being attractive, or feeling attractive, at least not in and of itself. It is about one’s sense of value and of goodness. It strikes to the heart of someone’s innermost self.

When you develop these eating-disordered attitudes and behaviors, as the obsessions and compulsions grow within you, you find yourself at a point when so much of yourself, of your self-worth, of your sense of accomplishment and personal value, becomes contingent on maintaining the appearance of your body. You feel that you need to do this, in order to make yourself whole, to redeem yourself and feel that you have worth.

These things eat your soul. They really do. What I mean by this, is that they become such a part of you, of who you are and of who you want to be, that in many ways your very self can become contingent on it. There comes to be so much guilt, so much self-loathing that comes if you gain a few pounds, or forget to work out—- you begin to really feel like you are an inferior person if your body maintenance falters. 

THIS is what makes eating disorders so abhorrant, and such a devastating disease. Certainly, the behaviors that eating disordered individuals engage in are physically harmful, especially in the longer term—- but I do not even think that this is the worst part of it. The true evil here, is that it has to do with hating your self. Not just your body. It is a matter of your innermost sense of worth. To hate oneself is a terrible thing; perhaps one of the most terrible things for a person.

The truth is that you cannot, CANNOT, make the physical appearance and supposed attractiveness of your body, your principle locus of self-worth. You cannot put your center there, if you ever are to truly live or to truly be free. Eating disorders can be highly compartmentalized. When we fall into these kinds of behaviors and thought processes, there is always a part of us, I think, deep within our innermost Selves, that knows that this isn’t right. And yet it is so, so difficult to break out of these patterns of thinking once you become so deeply mired in them. 

I want to make it clear that no individual with an eating disorder should EVER be derided for thinking this way. These things grow inside you slowly over time; they consume you bit by bit. An eating disorder is not born in a day, and it does not go away instantly. There’s no magic moment wherein one thinks, “Oh, wait, I have intrinsic value by virtue of being a person, and associating so much guilt and self-loathing with food and weight is learned and socially constructed bullshit! The hell was I thinking! I’ma go eat a sandwich now.” If only it were that easy to break out of these nigh-delusory ways of thinking about oneself. The truth is that these things are never, ever easy. 

There is a misconception among some people, I think, that eating disorders are motivated merely by vanity. This is not the case. I do not think the young women who tend to be the ones to suffer from this illness, chose to place transfer their sense of their chance for self-worth onto their body’s appearance because they’re vain, or because they’re such dull or vapid people that looks are all they’ve got. These things are learned, and they are absorbed from the surrounding culture and social environment. So much of advertising and media projects this idea that if you lose weight, or get fit, you become a better person overall. Changing your body becomes a proxy for changing your whole self, and it is a mistaken transference. 

Being thin, or fit, or attractive, will not make you whole. It won’t make you a good or “better” person. I find it so troubling that the general cultural climate regarding attitudes toward body shape and size, perpetuated all too often by advertisers trying to sell products or entertainment by preying on insecurity, so often leads people to think otherwise.

*ETA: Response to lunarskylar’s comment: Fake or not, that changes nothing of what I have said. I still feel that the attitude expressed by that person reflects much of how people who suffer from EDs view their body and their ED behaviors. This isn’t about this one person. I was using what they said as an example, and it was what motivated me to make this post. This goes far beyond any one person. This is a pervasive problem that is rooted, at least partly, on a social level. People learn things from the surrounding culture—- not only from parents, peers, and others they have contact with, but also from the media. Vicarious social learning by way of the media is not to be underestimated. It is a very real phenomenon, and much of it is absorbed in a way of which individuals are not always fully aware.

to the freelice community

totallylies:

lyingcharacteristics:

photonasty:

freeliceurallbullies:

fuk u fat people

I don’t mean to be rude, but is this blog a parody, or are they serious? I can’t quite tell, which is unsettling.

^ this

Saying that we are fat people when you haven’t seen us in your entire life is pretty funny and I am also asking myself if this is a joke.

Honestly, although I realize that many of these people shouting “UR JUST FAT AND JEALOUS” are teenagers, I still find myself surprised sometimes that they can’t see through the obvious invalidity of that response. I wonder: are they really serious? Do they really think that this is a valid response? Do they really think that responding that way does anything at all, other than make them look like a fool? 

I’m somewhat disturbed, generally, by the lengths to which some of these fans will go to deny that their Tumblr idol of choice is capable of doing any wrong. Even when shown copious amounts of evidence indicating the contrary, they ignore it, chosing instead to lie to themselves and continue venerating the person. I realize “venerating” is an awfully strong word choice, and perhaps inappropriately so. However, the extent to which these fans elevate such e-popular individuals to almost idolatrous levels, is part of what unnerves me about this. If you look at the wording and tone of the ask-box fan mail Tumblr Twats get from their fans, there’s this lurking sense of deference, even obsequiousness, as if these people are prostrating themselves at the feet of someone as mundane and, frankly, boring, as Felice Fawn or Daisy Lola. What the actual, serious fuck?

I know that these are young teens we’re talking about, but even with this in mind, I still find this disturbing. The big problem here isn’t just that some lonely, confused 14-year-old has glorified some popular Tumblr girl into a personal hero and role model. That sort of thing will generally pass. No, the biggest problem is that when people have those attitudes toward a public figure (even a Tumblr Twat), they so easily and so willingly will believe what these people have to say, and will gladly hand power over to them. A lot of these popular Tumblr girls are taking advantage of that, scamming their fans and otherwise using these young kids’ trust and admiration against them in an insidious way. This is not in any way acceptable or justifiable behavior. It is downright wrong. 

You Can’t Be A Teenager Forever

A popular older teen on Tumblr said once that she’d rather die, literally die, than age past 22. I suppose the idea is to be some sort of puer aeternis, forever 16 and sipping cocktails in the rain in some vaguely idealized Endless Summer. The truth, however, is that you can’t be a teenager forever. In fact, to do so would be to arrest one’s own development as a person, and to cheat oneself out the fullness of the experience of life.

Many young people really do strike me as morbidly afraid of growing up— and frankly, so do a lot of people, especially those who, like me, are currently in their late teens or very early 20s. I suppose that in our culture or whatever, there can sometimes be sort of an underlying attitude that your youth is the best time of your life, and that it’s all downhill from there. It used to be that high-schoolers were told, “Enjoy this, these are the best years of your life”. These days, this is more often said with regard to the “college years”, but the effect, I think, is largely the same. We mock those among us who are older as past their prime, as weak in body and mind, as if you’re a withered husk and a shadow of your former self because you have hit a certain age. People who are “middle-aged” speak of being “over the hill”, as if there can be nothing but decay and decompensation after a certain point. I think that this is a mistaken, and indeed even a destructive, attitude. It deprives the latter half of life of the fullness and meaning that ought perhaps to characterize those years. Certainly, the years of youth are an important time, and one to be enjoyed. However, life does not, and cannot, stop at 18. You have to grow up.

Tryhard Efags and the Social Contract: What It Means to be “Fake”

Felice Fawn, and indeed most efags, are bad actors. They really are. They’re just not convincing at all at being what they’re trying to be, and frankly, their transparency is almost unsettling, at least to me.

To illustrate what I mean, IT’S TIME FOR SOME MOTHERFUCKING ERNEST BECKER UP IN THIS BITCH.
(Quotes are from The Birth and Death of Meaning).

“[People] do not like to see another who is too absorbed in his own staging at the expense of convincing delivery of his lines. This kind of stage ineptitude is like performance in a high school play, where self-conscious actors deliver stilted, halting, unconvincing lines, or overly fluent ones. When we talk about someone who is ‘phony’ we mean that his staging of himself is overly obvious. He is unconvincing because he allows us to see his efforts at delivering the right lines.” 

And there you have it: the phenomenon of the tryhard.

In Becker’s words, “Social ceremonial is a joint theatrical staging whose purpose is to sustain and create meaning for all its members”; and that “performance has to be convincing, meaningful, genuine, or we fall down on our part of the social bargain— cultural meaning must be sustained by the individual actors”. (Here, he draws heavily on the work of sociologist Irving Goffman). 

The Common Efag Tryhard, in the glaring transparency of their frantic social posturing, undermines this construction of social meaning; but more than that, and perhaps more devastatingly, they undermine themselves. So long as you try to mold yourself, your actions, and your demeanor into your idea of what other people want for you, and your self-worth is contingent on other people’s approval of your personality and lifestyle, I believe that you really cannot stand on your own two feet, as a human being, and have an authentic inner identity. I think this is the saddest thing about the efags: so long as they continue to do as they do, they will not be happy and they will not be fulfilled. 
Of course, I am not these people, nor do I know them, so I cannot say this with absolute certainty. However, I feel very strongly that this is the case, and that efaggery, by its very nature, undermines a person’s ability to enjoy life in its fullness and to experience themselves. Obviously some of these people are douchebags; I’m not trying to paint them as nothing but victims, especially Failice, who I find to be one of the worst. However, they are all unhappy. Look at Audrey and Hanna. They seemed so carefree five years ago. These days, you can see in their dead eyes and wan smiles how empty they really are inside.

I am reblogging to say that I have a problem with this general attitude. Yes, people can be ignorant, often astoundingly so. However, for the most part, I honestly think that it does little good to seethe in anger at their ignorance, or to look upon such people with contempt. Like it or not, they are people, just like yourself. Although they may hold to attitudes and opinions that you feel to be incorrect, I think that it is far more conducive to one’s own mental hygiene, as well as more effective in terms of actually addressing the problem of ignorance, if one instead takes an attitude of patience, compassion, and a willingness to try to understandwhy these “dumb motherfuckers” think and behave the way that they do. I will be quick to say that there are situations where this does not hold, but I do get the impression that this macro is referring to a sort of general ignorance and dumbassery which, though highly irritating, is usually fairly benign. “Woe is me, my poor special unique self, alone in a world of idiotic scum”, is in my opinion a destructive attitude that does no good for anyone. The feeling of being surrounded by idiots is certainly something that many people go through. I know there were times in my adolescence when I felt that way about some of my peers. However, I can’t help feeling that it does little good to take a chronically negative outlook as a reaction to ignorant people’s lack of understanding— not because you feel compassion for these people; not because you wish that they, too, could come to know and to understand the things that you can see so clearly, but to which they seem so blind; but because you view them with contempt. It just seems counterproductive to me.

I am reblogging to say that I have a problem with this general attitude. Yes, people can be ignorant, often astoundingly so. However, for the most part, I honestly think that it does little good to seethe in anger at their ignorance, or to look upon such people with contempt. Like it or not, they are people, just like yourself. Although they may hold to attitudes and opinions that you feel to be incorrect, I think that it is far more conducive to one’s own mental hygiene, as well as more effective in terms of actually addressing the problem of ignorance, if one instead takes an attitude of patience, compassion, and a willingness to try to understandwhy these “dumb motherfuckers” think and behave the way that they do. I will be quick to say that there are situations where this does not hold, but I do get the impression that this macro is referring to a sort of general ignorance and dumbassery which, though highly irritating, is usually fairly benign. “Woe is me, my poor special unique self, alone in a world of idiotic scum”, is in my opinion a destructive attitude that does no good for anyone. The feeling of being surrounded by idiots is certainly something that many people go through. I know there were times in my adolescence when I felt that way about some of my peers. However, I can’t help feeling that it does little good to take a chronically negative outlook as a reaction to ignorant people’s lack of understanding— not because you feel compassion for these people; not because you wish that they, too, could come to know and to understand the things that you can see so clearly, but to which they seem so blind; but because you view them with contempt. It just seems counterproductive to me.

(Source: wakemeupwhenimfamous, via alienteacup)

I’m, uh… not quite sure I understand this.
I’m not sure if this is related to the intended meaning of this image, BUT… I am incredibly annoyed and tired, just in general, of the whole attitude that, for women, sex with men is intrinsically a form of exploitation or victimization by said men. SOME OF US LIKE DICKS, okay? They’re not that scary.

I’m, uh… not quite sure I understand this.

I’m not sure if this is related to the intended meaning of this image, BUT… I am incredibly annoyed and tired, just in general, of the whole attitude that, for women, sex with men is intrinsically a form of exploitation or victimization by said men. SOME OF US LIKE DICKS, okay? They’re not that scary.

(Source: theknivesdonthaveyourback, via judith-christ)

So, the Millionaires have a new song, “Drinks On Me”.

I have a love-hate relationship with the Millionaires and their surely-this-must-be-a-joke brand of “DGAF” party songs, but I couldn’t help thinking—- “Is this even music?” I mean, I’m not even sure what to think. “Party like a Millionaire” is a shining gem of “Uh… seriously?”, but I think this is more atunal. Then again, it’s not all that much different than most of what’s on the Top 40.

The Millionaires are kind of like Ke$ha or LMFAO with less tact and less musical complexity… and that’s just kind of sad, honestly. Like, overall, as far as heinously mediocre music goes, they themselves are a mediocre excuse for such. 

(If you’ve ever heard early Millionaires, though, like early Millionaires, you will know what a vast improvement this is. To see what I mean, look up “Painted Whore”, “Ho Down”, or the early unmixed version of “Rich Boy” or “I Like Money”. I can’t believe I know their song names. FAIL on my part.)

LJ is being a dick, here’s a comment I wrote on efagz about some people soliciting donations and such

For my own reference, this is my response to THOSE TWO GIRLS whose names I’m hesitant to mention, trying to solicit $20,000 in donations to “go on tour”. ~*~*~*~*~ I have no experience whatsoever with the ins and outs of touring, but does it actually require $20,000? I mean, I’m sure it can cost that much, but for a band that’s just starting out, it seems a little optimistic to think people are going to donate that much. Then again, like I said, I don’t really know anything about this kind of stuff. Secondly, there’s something really grating about the lengths to which they’re obviously going to try to look artistic and sophisticated (yet also ~*~totally punk and edgy~*~), in terms of what they write about themselves and how they write it. The diction is hamhandedly pretentious. “[T]rying to make grand experiences in this world while bringing you on our journey”—- what? “make… experiences”? It sounds markedly like someone for whom English is a second language (in some languages, for example French, expressing that sentiment would indeed involve a word corresponding to the English “do” or “make”).

“It is our dream to take our love of performance to the next level and manifest successful careers through music and acting”… once again, “lolwut?”. “Manifest successful careers”— what sense does that make? It’s like they chose the word “manifest” because it ~*~sounds fancy*~~ even though it hardly works in that sentence.

Overall, though, that last sentence (the one quoted in the above paragraph) really drives home the fact that this is basically a “fund my life” project, as has been discussed in above comments, which is not appropriate to solicit donations for. This obviously isn’t about wanting to make music, it’s about them wanting to be paid attention to. The whole “love of performance” thing just doesn’t seem to ring true. What I see here, aren’t two girls trying to get into music with a serious passion for what they’re doing. I see two girls who want to be paid attention to, to, er, “manifest”, “successful careers through music and acting”. Wait, acting? Where does acting come into this? I thought they were trying to tour? Obviously, it doesn’t matter to these girls whether it’s music, or acting, or whatever, as long as it’s associated with the entertainment industry and thereby with celebrity and with being famous. If you want to be an attention whore online, that’s your problem, but to me, soliciting donations basically because you ~*~want to be famous~*~ doesn’t seem quite right.

In a way, we all die alone.

But at the same time, no one ever really dies alone.